Sunday, March 15, 2009

Tournament Report :: Eastern Class 2009



I played in the Eastern Class chess tournament last weekend, Friday 6 March to Sun 8 March. The crosstable is here, and I played in the C section. Out of five games, I played four, leaving early on Sunday to spend the evening with my S.O. Shortly before the tournament, my rating spiked (see earlier posts about coming back to OTB from hiatus), pushing me from the D to C section, so I was low guy on the totem pole. This is a good place to be... if you want good competition...

I am analyzing my games now, and will post analysis shortly. For now, here is a qualitative summary:

Round 1, Friday PM, I played Black, win:
I got to the playing hall in Sturbridge MA with just minutes to spare. I was working all day on analytical products and my brain was cooking, so all I needed to do was chill a bit, and shift gears to chess. My opponent played 1.d4 to which I am starting to learn the 1...d5 response. I was channeling Silman and worked hard to impose my will on the game, and overcome fears of Bd3 and Qc2 battery staring down my hapless h7 pawn, by using fast Queenside action to take my opponent off balance. After that I was channeling Petrosian (*) and spent time thinking mostly about taking away my opponents squares, even at the expense of perhaps a quicker win. Several people commented on my game, some noting how I shut down all my opponents' counterplay, some noting I missed quicker wins. 

I am happy with the game. My heart and soul were in the game the whole time and not wavering. My opponent re-entered, played the fast games Saturday morning, and ended with a respectable 3.0/5.0 result.

(*) Or so I thought. Some people have pointed out that I am not at the level where I can really comprehend Petrosian, so let's say that I focused on his "prevent my opponent's plans" part of his style. I have yet to really understand his subtle maneuvering...

Round 2, Saturday AM, I played White, lose:
I faced a familiar opponent with whom I've played off-beat openings with in the distant past, and this game was no exception. I later learned I experienced the joys of the Budapest Defense and I was on my own wits starting on my opponent's second move. I took the pawn and battened down the hatches, bracing for an attack, giving back the pawn when doing so allowed me an opportunity to consolidate. I went on to defend against a relentless attack on my Kingside, through move 20, and even starting some Queenside counterplay on move 21. We both burned up plenty of time on the clocks, since I was not just defending, but also giving my opponent a few problems to solve. Around move 25 my opponent had about 1 minute left on his analogue clock. I had four minutes. All I had to do was wait him out. My position was fine. But like all the previous twenty-some-odd moves, I needed to be on the lookout for one move mates, cheapos, etc. On move 27, it looked like the Kingside tension was subsiding, and the Queenside was heating up (which it was), but... there was still one more cheapo to defend against. In this transition moment of shifting tension, I took my eye of the ball for just a second, and missed a mate-in-one. Doh!

I am disappointed in the loss, but am pleased with my play prior to move 27... My opponent went on to win the section with a 4.5/5.0 result.

Round 3, Saturday PM, I played Black, draw:
I faced an up and coming, and very well mannered junior, who plays 1.e4, so I played the Caro-Kann, despite still being rusty with it. Of course he enters into a line that I am unfamiliar with 1.e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 4. Nf3 e6 5.Be3. Hmmm... I proceed to burn up time, because I knew I needed to push ...c5, but kept thinking I needed to prepare more. Meanwhile he already played c3. Then I think I need to prepare more, and so on. I never end up doing the ...c5 break I wanted to do. In the end, I 'm not sure he had any more clues as to what was going on because I was pressuring him in ways that was not called for in the position. This culminates in a combination which looks favorable to him (win the exchange), but a few moves later I can force the exchange back, and worse for him, now we are in a drawn endgame. He was very gracious, and we agreed to a draw.

I really need to practice being flexible (like Round 1) and when one plan doesn't work out (like waiting too long for the ...c5 push), formulate a new plan and move on. My opponent went on to a very good 3.5/5.0 result.

Round 4, Sunday AM, I played White, lose:
I faced an opponent who is a nice chap, but whose play for some reason, brought out bad habits in me which I thought I had overcome. First bad habit was assuming that Sunday's games are going to be easy. In fact, going into Sunday AM with 1.5 points practically guarantees that your opponent will be gunning extra hard for a win. And they should be. That's the point. The second bad habit is not respecting your opponent's moves. I can't verbalize this precisely, but that's what was going on in my head. Why, I can't tell you. In Round 1 I was busy trying to get into my opponent's head and shutting down his plans. In this game I wasn't respecting his moves, only to get annoyed when his moves start to add up to serious pressure. As early as move six I start to be adventurous in ways that are unwarranted. Followed by an over-reaction on move 10 that led to a permanent and debilitating weakness. My opponent rightfully picked on this weakness until he had a severe cramping effect on my game, snuffing out any/all maneuvering, ultimately forcing severe material loss.

My opponent played well, I certainly didn't. My opponent went on to get a reasonable 2.0/5.0 score.

I will post analysis of my games shortly. All in all, of the four games I played I am pleased with three of them, and my last was a big warning that bad habits never really die, they just lay in wait. My best good-bad habit ratio was Round 1, my worst good-bad habit ratio was Round 4. My job as a chess novice is to keep my bad habits down so my good ones can thrive. 

The good habits I want are:
  • Keep my heart and mind in the game at all times, don't let up even for one move
  • Be flexible. Look for short plans that are doable
  • Respect your opponents moves, figure out his plans, and act to shut them down
  • For goodness sake, I need to learn openings out to at least 5-7 moves (with ideas)!
  • Keep up the analysis routine
The bad habits I need to suppress are:
  • Not paying attention (not respecting) your opponents moves, plans, etc.
  • Being OCD about plans whose time has come and gone
  • Being a slacker regarding opening preparation and analysis
This is going to be a long journey.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

The Beginnings of an Improvement Plan

I just got back from vacation which was the perfect opportunity to try out a new improvement plan regiment. Nothing fancy, just a few solid books and my rationale holding them together:
  • Understanding Chess Move by Move, Nunn
  • Learn Chess Tactics, Nunn
  • The Amateur's Mind, Silman
  • Chess Visualization Course, General Tactics, Anderson
  • (finished prior to vacation) Logical Chess Move by Move, Chernev
I generally did a little from each book in chunks of chapters, then moved to the next book. The theme was to alternate between games and tactics. "Move by Move" is full games of course, while "Amateur's Mind" featured parts of games where big plans are (or should be) formed. "Chess Tactics" is divided by theme, based on real games and built up quickly in difficulty. "Chess Visualization" requires the reader to visualize a position after a prescribed sequence of tactical moves. So you didn't have to find the move, but you had to correctly answer questions about the resulting position.

In the past, I'd be blasting through CT-ART 3, or reading some theory book, or some "evaluate this position" book. What I was missing was seeing the whole game, and watching the factors that decide the game be employed by the players, and wax and wane and why.

Of course I was also reviewing some of my past games played at MetroWest CC and Boston University Open. Periodically after going through a few books, I'd play through a game just to see if I could look at the game differently. Indeed, some games I can see through different eyes. Here is a good example (hold your nose):

[Event "MCC Jan 2007"]
[Site "Natick MA"]
[Date "2007.01.02"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Reed, Harvey"]
[Black "Michael, William"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C68"]
[WhiteElo "1484"]
[BlackElo "1735"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Bxc6 dxc6 5. O-O Bg4 6. Re1 Qf6 7. d3 Bxf3 8. Qxf3 Qxf3 9. gxf3 O-O-O 10. Be3 g6 11. Nc3 Bh6 12. Kf1 Bxe3 13. fxe3 Ne7 14. Ke2 Rd7 15. Rad1 Rhd8 16. Rf1 c5 17. a4 c6 18. a5 c4 19. dxc4 Rxd1 20. Rxd1 Rxd1 21. Kxd1 Kc7 22. c5 f5 23. Ke2 Kd7 24. Kf2 Ke6 25. exf5+ gxf5 26. e4 f4 27. Na4 Ng8 28. Nb6 Nf6 29. Nc4 Ne8 30. b4 Kf6 31. Kg2 Ke6 32. Kh3 Kf6 33. Kg4 Nc7 34. Nd6 Ne6 35. c3 Ng5 



One would expect the simple 36. Nxb7. In fact this was White's (me) goal for many moves, since 22. c5 to be exact. So why on earth would White all of a sudden make a U-turn, which ultimately backfires in a humiliating mess? I think because deep down White didn't trust his own analysis. Probably because he is analytically lazy and therefore doesn't trust himself. The rest of the game continues to disappoint, meeting the predictably bad end in another 12 moves:

36. Ne8+?? Kg6 37. Ng7 {offer draw} Nxe4 38. fxe4 Kxg7 39. Kf3 Kg6 40. Kg4 Kh6 41. Kh4 f3 42. Kg3 Kh5 43. Kxf3 Kh4 44. Kg2 Kg4 45. h3+ Kf4 46. Kf2 Kxe4 47. Ke2 h6 48. Kd2 Kf3 0-1

Several things struck me as I was going through the book regiment:
  • Reviewing whole games is something that I've needed to do for years, but I've always avoided. Starting with the simple Chernev book was the best thing I have done since I started adult onset of chess. I have Howard Goldowsky to thank. He claims to have gotten the "unlearn before you learn" religion from Heisman, and passed it on to me. 
  • Tactics are always important, and there is life beyond CT-ART, although I must admit CT-ART 3.0 is the reason I don't drop pieces left and right anymore.
  • Analysis is hard work. It took me three days to work through game 7 (Kasparov-Karpov) in Nunn's "Move by Move". I feel like I have a lot more patience with analysis, and will start doing deep analysis on my games.
  • Mental toughness can frequently make up for intermitent weaknesses in analysis during a game.
  • The whole imbalance theory of Silman's was starting to make sense by the time I hit the chapter on Initiative. That was a scary feeling.
And then it hit me. Valery Frenklahk, from whom I took half a dozen lessons from in the late 90's, was right: Chess is a game of squares! Just play chess!

Why was I remembering chess lessons from the past decade? I think because he had a style that made a big impression on me, plus he said incomprehensible things to me, and I was determined to somehow figure it out, even if I forgot about it first.

Things are still confusing for me, which is ok. I still need to do analysis of my MetroWest CC game from last Tuesday, but I avoided second guessing, did a little more on the job analysis, and kept my mental toughness, not getting despondent when my opponent made an unanticipated (and aggravating) move. You don't even have to hold your nose...

[Event "MCC Feb 2009"]
[Site "Natick MA"]
[Date "2009.02.17"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Reed, Harvey"]
[Black "Callahan, Daniel"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E61"]
[WhiteElo "1373"]
[BlackElo "1232"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e3 O-O 5. Nf3 d6 6. Bd3 b6 7. O-O Bb7 8. Qe2 c5 9. d5 e6 10. e4 h6 



With Black's last move he weakened his pawn structure. Previously White had plans focused on a strong center first, then Kingside pressure later. With 10... h6, White can think about breaking up Black's Kingside:

11. dxe6 fxe6 12. e5 Nh5 13. Bxg6 Nf4 14. Bxf4 Rxf4 15. exd6 Bxf3 16. Qxe6+ Kh8 17. d7 Bc6 18. Rad1 Bxd7 19. Qd5 Nc6 20. Qxd7 Qxd7 21. Rxd7 Ne5 22. Nd5 Rg4 23. Bf5 Rg5 24. f4 Rxf5 25. fxe5 Rxf1+ 26. Kxf1 Bxe5 



With White's next move, he nullifies Black's dark Bishop. Next is a plan to exchange the Kingside pawns, leaving all the pawns on side (favorible to White's Knight), which is frustrating to Black's Bishop. As they say, it's now just a "matter of technique". Of course my technique is still simple and crude, so it takes me another 42 moves...

27. b3 Rf8+ 28. Ke2 Bxh2 29. Rxa7 Re8+ 30. Kf3 Bb8 31. Rb7 Rf8+ 32. Kg4 Rg8+ 33. Kf3 Be5 34. g4 Bg7 35. Nxb6 Rf8+ 36. Kg2 Bd4 37. Nd5 Rf2+ 38. Kh3 Rxa2 39. Kg3 Ra8 40. Kf3 Rf8+ 41. Ke4 Re8+ 42. Kf5 Rf8+ 43. Kg6 Rg8+ 44. Kxh6 Rxg4 45. Rb8+ Rg8 46. Rb7 Bg7+ 47. Kg6 Bd4+ 48. Kh5 Rg1 49. Nf4 Rh1+ 50. Kg6 Rg1+ 51. Kh6 Bg7+ 52. Kh5 Rh1+ 53. Kg6 Rg1+ 54. Kf5 Rf1 55. Ke4 Re1+ 56. Kd5 Re5+ 57. Kc6 Rg5 58. Ne6 Rg6 59. Rxg7 Rxe6+ 60. Kd5 Rb6 61. Kxc5 Rxb3 62. Rg4 Rf3 63. Kd4 Rf7 64. c5 Kh7 65. Kc4 Rd7 66. c6 Rc7 67. Kc5 Kh6 68. Kb6 Rc8 69. c7 Kh7 1-0

...and The Quest continues...

Monday, February 16, 2009

I'm back...

Just got back from 2 weeks of vacation in the Caribbean. Fun in the sun and chess improvement too. I'll blog later this week to detail the scoop on my improvement plan.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

The Structure of My Struggle

I am approaching my personal improvement in this way:
  • Un-learning: 
    I have spent years trying to learn stuff way too fancy for my own good. Right now I am working on unlearning that stuff a la Heisman (home page), as channeled by Goldowsky (Mongoose Times). I started with "Logical Chess Move by Move" (Chernev) [done] and "The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played" (Chernev) [in progress]. I will follow this up with "Understanding Chess Move by Move" (Nunn), "Learn Chess Tactics" (Nunn), "The Amateur's Mind" (Silman), and "Chess Visualization Course" (Anderson).
  • Praxis:
    I'm back to regular Tuesday night play at MetroWest Chess Club, when not traveling for work. Also, I play the occasional game on ICC (Internet Chess Club), but no blitz. In the ICC games my goal is to develop properly to enter a decent middlegame.
  • Analysis:
    Take each of my weekly MetroWest CC games and seek advice, let Fritz run through it, and give it it my own blood sweat and tears. My goal will be to analyze all games somewhat, and analyze some of them deeply, with a post to this blog.
  • Attitude:
    This video of Josh Waitzkin giving a talk at Google sums up what I aspire to. Everyone needs to have their personal mountain to climb.
  • Competition:
    In addition to Club tournaments at MetroWest CC, I will play in two or three big tournaments during the year. Right now I am entered in the Eastern Class and Foxwoods CCA tournaments.
My goal is to use this blog to keep me on the path to improvment.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

I have Adult Onset of Chess

I am a recovering chess novice. 

I dabbled in chess starting in school, and "got serious" in the '90s when I started playing rated chess. I thought I would get better by reading theory and fancy books, and never progressed very far. Sure I've occasionally bagged an 1800 USCF ELO player, but for the most part, I've vacillated between 1100 and 1500 USCF ELO. My correspondence varies between 1300 and 1700.

Aside from competition, I have contributed to several chess organizations and this has been very fulfilling. If you have never volunteered for your chess organization, you should consider it. It is usually hard work, necessary work, and it improves the lives of many including children, the future of our country. Please consider volunteering.

The last couple of years I traveled extensively and pulled back on OTB chess. Now that I can start playing somewhat consistently again, I want to actually get better. 

This blog is my quest.

Harvey Reed
Clerk and Marketing Director, MetroWest Chess Club
Director, Correspondence Chess League of America